Hedge fund performance was dominated by the exposure to market risk as those fundamental equity funds that held more market risk overlooked style performance. However, the average returns mask the large dispersion across styles. We still use indices for analysis because it does provide some information on what the average investor may expect. For example, while CTAs were down, on average, for the first quarter, anecdotal evidence from managers sending me reports shows some up in the double digits for the first quarter. Winners made big money in the last quarter.
Call it luck or skill, the vast differences in performance were based on two key factors – one, long equity beta exposure going into the new year, and two, long fixed income exposure globally, especially in March. Faster models made money. Discretionary traders who pounced on the changes in central bank thinking or those who over-weighted fixed income were winners. You made your year in three months if you got those two trades right. If you missed this or were late to the party, you are playing catch-up and having calls to explain performance to clients.
A dirty secret for hedge fund management is that investors don’t want hedges during big market up moves. They want performance. Underperformance during large market beta moves requires an explanation from managers.
Competing head-to-head to outsmart others doing the same strategy is often a tough road. In trend following circles, giants like Man AHL, Winton, and Aspect dominate assets under management. This enables them to hire top PhDs, deploy better technology, test ideas rapidly, and outspend smaller players on sales and marketing. So how can a smaller […]
We had an interesting conversation with an extremely sophisticated allocator recently. He asked, given that you have had a good run with a long gold position this year, with large open profits, how much will you lose if it reverses hard and you are stopped out at lower levels?”. It’s a question that gets to the heart of trading, and ultimately deals with the difference between what’s known as open equity and closed equity.
The S&P 500 continued to climb steadily up to the last trading day of the month even though market participants knew that day could bring volatility, as the U.S. Federal Reserve (the “Fed”) was scheduled to announce their latest monetary policy update on July 31st. Speculation about their intentions to lower interest rates for the first time in ten years had been a market focus for months. Fed Funds futures pricing is often used to estimate the probability of pending Fed interest rate changes, and had signaled the most likely decrease to be between 25 and 50 basis points. However, when Charmain Powell announced the 25 basis point cut he also implied it might be a “one and done” scenario rather than a prolonged rate cutting cycle favored by market participants, causing an immediate decline in stock prices. The selling in the S&P was strong, sending the Index to its largest intraday decline since early May. In fact, prior to that drop, the S&P had not had a 1% daily gain or loss in the previous 36 consecutive trading days, the longest streak since early October 2018.