You would not think some hedge funds would be down so significantly for September returns given that the major stock index (SPX) moved higher, but upheaval in small cap, value and growth harmed the average equity hedge fund. There were some positive gains in relative value managers, but it was a generally a tough month for those trying to actively find returns.
With a quarter to go in 2018, there will have to be more aggressive risk-taking to get hedge fund managers in the black. While the average hedge fund may be dong better than long bond funds, most investors did not buy hedge funds as bond substitute but as alpha generators. Research on money managers show a change in behavior in the last months of the year based on relative performance. Winners will take risk off the table and losers may push their risk exposure.
After hundreds of discussions with hedge fund managers, I am still surprised that there is a fear of revealing investment processes under the assumption that someone will steal their ideas and intellectual capital. There are few investment styles that are truly unique and special. What is special is still strategy execution – the practical process of delivering returns. Skill is with the decision-making execution of information and strategy.
All hedge funds are not created equal as the return box chart shows for the post Financial Crisis period. There is a significant amount of dispersion across hedge fund styles. Over the period 2009-2018, the difference between the best and worst hedge fund category is almost 7 percent after we account for global equities and bonds.
The attraction to private equity and other less liquid alternatives is clear from the Guide to Alternatives by JP Morgan Asset Management. The return profile is much higher for private equity and debt funds than more liquid alternatives and global bonds; however, the dispersion in returns is multiples higher than what can be expected from other public categories.
